**We Deliver World-Wide**, and we are the only 'Jim Humble approved' New Zealand supplier.
Our MMS Bottles contain 5.5oz (163gm) by weight,
or 125ml by volume of 28% Sodium Chlorite as per the MMS Health Restoration protocol.
Information presented on this website is for educational purposes only,
and is NOT intended to diagnose, treat, cure, prevent disease or replace
the advice of a licensed HealthCare practitioner.
It may seem like a miracle, but it's just plain
The MMS protocol consists of activating Sodium Chlorite, to form Chlorine Dioxide.
Chlorine Dioxide is not Chlorine just as Carbon Dioxide (e.g. breath) is not Carbon (e.g. coal)
Chlorine Dioxide has been scientifically proven, and is officially accepted to be a highly
effective destroyer of pathogens, fungi, disease, bacteria and
It is 'officially approved' for this purpose; being commonly used in
several brands of disease treating mouthwash, in drinking water, on
food preparation areas, and even on living or harvested produce.
little wonder that it should be discovered to have the same benefits in
the human body!
"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident".
- Chlorine Dioxide is a scientifically proven pathogen killer used extensively in drinking water.
Disinfection with chlorine dioxide has a high effectiveness in killing Giardia;
Disinfection with chlorine dioxide has a high effectiveness in killing bacteria;
Disinfection with chlorine dioxide has a high effectiveness in killing viruses;
- Chlorine Dioxide is an approved disease treating ingredient in several brands of mouthwash. - Chlorine Dioxide 'supports' healthy Immune System function. - Chlorine Dioxide is FDA approved for food contact use: (Food Contact Substance CAS Reg. No. 10049-04-4). - Chlorine
Dioxide has been proven safe for human consumption in
clinical trials: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569027/pdf/envhper00463-0059.pdf "...the relative safety of oral ingestion of
chlorine dioxide... was demonstrated". (In one 6-month phase of
the tests, the dosages were the same as MMS doses). - Chlorine Dioxide has undergone official trials by the Red Cross in Uganda, and overcame malaria in less than 24 hours. A documentary of this trial can be viewed on youtube by searching 'malaria MMS Red Cross Uganda (18 minutes)'. - Chlorine Dioxide has already been tested and officially acknowledged for a wide range of health related applications:
Protective effect of low-concentration chlorine dioxide gas against influenza A virus infection: http://vir.sgmjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/89/1/60
Use of chemically-stabilized chlorite solution for inhibiting an antigen-specific immune response: http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=1999017787&IA=WO1999017787&DISPLAY=DESC
Chlorine dioxide sterilization of red blood cells for transfusion (abstract no. PB0953): http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov
On the Mechanisms of Toxicity of Chlorine Oxides Against Malarial Parasites: http://bioredox.mysite.com/CLOXhtml/CLOXprnt+refs.htm
- The National Poisons Centre has received no complaints or reports of adverse reactions in relation to the use of MMS, over a 13 year period of it's use in NZ:see Letter here
- The Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (CARM) has received no reports of adverse reactions in relation to the use of MMS at the time of writing: see Letter here
- Medsafe admit that their department has conducted NO testing of MMS or chlorine dioxide, upon which they could support any of their claims regarding MMS being dangerous: see Letter here
- The FDA admit that their claims about activated MMS being dangerous are not supported by any scientific evidence. When asked for their evidence, all they could supply as evidence were the same statements on their website stating that it is dangerous: see Letter here see Letter here
So if Chlorine Dioxide has passed clinical trials for safe human consumption, and is already scientifically proven and 'officially' accepted to effectively overcome disease; then why do some news articles and websites warn about the dangers of using MMS?
Is there any validity to the various claims being made about MMS being dangerous?
If the attacks by mainstream media regarding using MMS are truly about safety, then why do we never hear them reporting about the hundreds of thousands of people who die each year from vaccines and pharmaceutical drugs? MMS has not be proven to have killed anyone!
If their concerns are truly that a product should not be used if it can potentially cause vomiting or diarrhea, then shouldn't they also focus on banning chemotherapy, which DOES cause these plus many far more serious side effects, (the chemotherapy warning insert actually lists 'cancer and death' among the many horrible side effects).
If their concerns are about a product being used in the body that is toxic (although in the case of Chlorine Dioxide, it has been proven safe for human consumption); then why do we not hear mainstream media warnings about vaccines being injected into people that contain toxic ingredients such as formaldehyde, thimerosal, mercury, aluminium, and many others.
If bleach is dangerous, then why did authorities in quake stricken Christchurch advise people to put bleach in their drinking water?
And do 'official' double-blind tests of 'approved' products, really safeguard the public?
Therefore, regardless of the many thousands of success
worldwide, and recommendations that you may have heard from family and
friends; this website cannot and will not make any public claims that
MMS 'treats' or 'cures'
serious diseases or conditions; such as asthma, diabetes, autism, heart
disease, arthritis, HIV, AIDS, cancer, leukaemia, malaria, hepatitis A,
B and C, herpes, TB, lymes disease, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis,
sarcoidosis, scabies, candida, bronchitis, CHD, COPD, MRSA, crohn's
disease, colds, sore throats, dementia, dengue fever, eczema, swine
flu, allergies, acne, gum problems and many others.
as to what standards are used in this approval process. For example, of
the many that could be quoted, the pain killer drug Vioxx and the diabetes drug Avandia, are examples of
products that were approved by Medsafe.
any proper testing and evaluation have picked up on
these potential dangers?
A Royal Commision of Inquiry is normally carried out when an
incident causes the death of a dozen of so people. So why don't we
see such actions taken when a drug kills tens of thousands of
Medsafe officials we spoke with, have acknowledged this as fact. So
what does this mean?
Even though there are already several known natural cures for cancer,
if one of them were to be 'officially proven' as such, through
official clinical trials, it could never be publicly advertised as a
The wording of the Medicines Act 1981 prevents this from ever happening; along with the public advertising of
cures for all the other diseases listed in Schedule 1 of the Act.
As a well documented example, Dr Burzynski
in the USA developed a safe and effective cancer cure that has been fought for decades now by the 'powers that be'.
It appears that this discovery is being purposely resisted, and suppressed from public reach (in much the same way as with MMS), as it would
destroy the multi-billion dollar cancer industry, and dry up government
and private sector funding to pharmaceutical run cancer research institutes.
This unbelieveable story, of how the FDA have spent
millions trying to keep this safe and effective cancer cure discovery
from public reach, can be viewed on a youtube documentary.
Search 'Dr Burzynski full version' on youtube; you have to see it to believe it!
This is not the first time that this type of suppression has occurred. Natural cancer cures have been suppressed for many decades now. Search 'Cancer: The Forbidden Cures' on YouTube to see the history of the ongoing criminal actions of 'the powers that be'.
Another documentary that we highly recommend is called 'A World Without Cancer'.
This documentary not only has beneficial information for cancer
sufferers, but also reveals how you can easily avoid getting cancer in
the first place. Search 'A World Without Cancer' on youtube. This is suppressed information that the whole world needs to know about.
to MMS MMS is principally a water treatment product.
MMS (28% sodium chlorite), when mixed with a suitable activator produces chlorine dioxide.
Chlorine dioxide is scientifically proven to be one of the most
powerful pathogen killers known to man, and is commonly used in ‘water
It safely destroys viruses, bacteria, fungi, and disease causing
pathogens in drinking water, food preparation areas, and even on living
and harvested produce. MMS can be safely consumed when used to
purify drinking water. When you consider that the human body is 60
to 70percent water, you could also class
the human body as being a ‘water system’.
For travellers, MMS is perfect for
water when it is suspected of having a high risk of disease. Many water
treatment plants worldwide are switching to chlorine dioxide due to its superior pathogen killing abilities.
Chlorine dioxide is very different to chlorine, and destroys pathogens by oxidation, not chlorination. It does not harm healthy cells and beneficial bacteria in the body. The oxidation potential of various oxidisers is measured in volts.
Oxygen has a oxidation potential of 1.3 volts.
Hydrogen peroxide is 1.8 volts.
Ozone is 2.07 volts.
Chlorine dioxide is only 0.95 volts.
This means that any healthy cells and beneficial bacteria that are not harmed by oxygen, will definitely not be harmed by chlorine dioxide, because chlorine dioxide has a lower oxidation potential than oxygen.
Does chlorine dioxide produce byproducts?
Chlorine dioxide produces significantly less disinfection byproducts than chlorine, being another reason why many modern water treatment plants are switching to chlorine dioxide.
Chlorine dioxide only reacts with substances that give off an electron. Chlorine, oppositely, adds a chlorine atom to or substitutes a chlorine atom from the substance it reacts with.
During an oxidation reaction, chlorine dioxide is reduced to chloride, and no chlorinated substances are formed.
Alternatively, when chlorine reacts it does not only accept electrons; it also takes part in addition and substitution reactions. During these reactions, one or more chlorine atoms are added to the foreign substance.
Below is a summarized history of chlorine
dioxide taken from Wikipedia:
Chlorine dioxide is
used primarily (>95%) for bleaching of wood pulp, but is also used for
the bleaching of flour and for the disinfection of municipal drinking
water. The New York water treatment plant first used chlorine dioxide
for drinking water treatment in 1944.
Chlorine dioxide was introduced as a drinking water disinfectant on a
large scale in 1956, when Brussels, Belgium,
changed from chlorine to chlorine dioxide. Chlorine dioxide is used in
many industrial water treatment applications as a biocide including
process water and food processing. Chlorine dioxide is less corrosive
than chlorine and superior for the control of Legionella bacteria. Chlorine dioxide is far superior to copper-silver ionization
for Legionella control because unlike copper-silver ionization,
chlorine dioxide is: 1) an EPA approved biocide, 2) not negatively
impacted by pH and 3) does not lose efficacy over time because the
bacteria grow resistant to the biocide.
It can also be used
disinfection, and was the principal agent used in the decontamination
of buildings in the United States after the 2001 anthrax attacks. After the disaster of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, Louisiana and the surrounding Gulf
Coast, chlorine dioxide has been used to eradicate dangerous mold from houses inundated by
water from massive flooding.
dioxide can also be used in an oral rinse to treat oral disease and
important to note that the chlorine dioxide used in industry, is of
different concentrations and forms to that produced by the MMS
available from this website].
So are the benefits of chlorine dioxide
for the human body limited to drinking water purification and to 'treat oral disease', as seen in
No; it has actually been used successfully by thousands of people for
dozens of the diseases we commonly face today.
flags often rise immediately when the term “miracle” is used to
describe anything that amazes us, or when we don’t understand how it
does what it does. In this case, it is indeed amazing.
However, an explanation of why MMS is so effective as a pathogen
It’s not the MMS that destroys pathogens; the chlorine dioxide does
that. When you understand the chemistry, you’ll see that it’s not a
miracle… it just seems like one.
This oxidiser attacks germs, bacteria and viruses that are harmful to
When used in the body, MMS supports healthy Immune System function.
Chlorine dioxide is a chemical compound that consists of one chlorine ion bound to two ions of oxygen. Using the MMS protocol, you will produce chlorine dioxide in the range of 1ppm.
The MMS solution is 28% sodium chlorite in distilled water. You can produce chlorine dioxide with a single drop, when an "activator" of 5% hydrochloric acid, 50% citric acid, vinegar or lemon juice is added. "Applications" of chlorine dioxide range from 1 drop to a maximum of 12 drops.
A "maintenance application" is six drops. After adding the activator, the chemical reaction that turns sodium chlorite into chlorine dioxide takes only 20 seconds if using the 5% hydrochloric acid or 50% citric acid; or 3 minutes if using lemon juice or vinegar.
The activating ingredient in vinegar that makes the change possible is acetic acid. This weak acid acts like a blasting cap by lowering the pH of the chlorine dioxide, without setting it off. The natural pH of sodium chlorite is 13. Adding hydrochloric acid or citric acid or lemon juice or vinegar creates about 3 mg of unstable but still harmless chlorine dioxide.
When a chlorine dioxide ion contacts a harmful pathogen in a 'water
it instantly rips up to five electrons from the pathogen, in what can
be likened to a microscopic explosion… harmless to us, but terminal for
pathogens. The pathogen – an electron donor – is rendered harmless due
to the involuntary surrendering of its electrons to the chlorine
dioxide – an electron acceptor – and the resulting release of energy.
Oxidised by the chlorine ion, the former pathogen becomes a harmless
Once it encounters various pathogens in 'water
chlorine dioxide performs a highly energetic acceptance of four
electrons when it comes across any cell that is below a pH value of 7.
This means that diseased cells are essentially vaporised (i.e.,
“oxidised”) while healthy cells are unaffected.